Monday, August 28, 2006
Friday, August 25, 2006
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
After work
Tonight after work a coworker and I went north to do a little shooting. We intended to go find some bison to photograph (I was mostly along for the ride) but we instead found some beautiful bull moose. Four moose were feeding about 50 yards off the road. Bob lent me his 200-400mm lens and I also shot a few with his 600mm lens. I think these two moose shots were taken with the 600 and a 1.7x tele converter. After digital magnification, it is the equivalent of a 1500mm lens. The last image is me just me farting around and being all artistic/impressionistic. I thought I would take it because I know Darren likes that kind of photography. I think I'll even make him a print of this because he likes that artistic/impressionistic work so much. It was shot with the 200-400 lens.




Thursday, August 17, 2006
"I got stitches"
This last Sunday my sister and her family were in town. A couple of us were in the back yard with the dogs playing ball. My nephew was tossing a tennis ball for the dogs when on one throw he lost his balance from atop the rock he was standing. He nicked his eyebrow on a illplaced sprinkler head. Luckily for us we just happen to have a P.A. in the family that can do a little stitching up for free.
Recently I have been thinking that I would like to take some stock medical photography since I have easy access to facilities. So when this opportunity presented itself, along with a guaranteed model release, I jumped at the chance. Here is one of the better images from the shoot. I only had limited opportunity though since it only took 3 stitches. I also wished I had a macro lens handy.
Recently I have been thinking that I would like to take some stock medical photography since I have easy access to facilities. So when this opportunity presented itself, along with a guaranteed model release, I jumped at the chance. Here is one of the better images from the shoot. I only had limited opportunity though since it only took 3 stitches. I also wished I had a macro lens handy.
Monday, August 14, 2006
Sockeye Salmon
Idaho Statesman article published AUG 14, 2006
Sockeye head toward Sawtooths
Fish and Game biologist hopes up to 8 of 15 will make it through final leg of journey to Redfish Lake
A lonely sockeye salmon loitered Sunday in a pool on the Salmon River below the Sawtooth Hatchery, waiting to make its final trip home.
The endangered red fish is one of only 15 that passed through Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River in Washington, the last of eight dams between Idaho and the Pacific. If history is a good guide, up to eight of those fish may complete the final 452-mile trip past Lewiston, up the Salmon River, through Idaho's wilderness and into the Sawtooth Valley.
"They're starting to come back," said Paul Kline, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game biologist in charge of the sockeye captive breeding program.
The sockeye return either to a weir on Redfish Lake Creek or to a trap at the Sawtooth Hatchery, depending on where they are released and whether they came from naturally spawning fish in Redfish Lake. Some sockeye also return to Pettit and Alturas lakes, located above the hatchery, and are captured in the trap.
The sockeye, like all salmon runs this year, are arriving slightly later than usual, Kline said. But he is hopeful half of the 15 fish seen at Lower Granite will survive the last leg of the journey.
"We're still averaging 54 to 55 percent conversion since this program started," Kline said.
Sockeye were listed as an endangered species in 1991 as the population was heading toward extinction. The fish caught the region's imagination in 1992, when Lonesome Larry was the only sockeye to return to Redfish Lake.
He and just over a dozen other native sockeye that returned in the early 1990s provided the sperm and eggs for sockeye raised in several hatcheries and released back into the wild since as part of the captive breeding program. Earlier this year, an 11-member Independent Science Review Panel said downstream threats such as dams, predators and fishing, coupled with reduced genetic resiliency in the small sockeye population, make the $2.5 million annual program ineffective.
Last year, 23 sockeye made the trip to Lower Granite, but only six returned to the Sawtooth Valley.
"It's so sad to me to really think they might not come back," said Amanda Peacher, outreach director for Idaho Rivers United in Boise. "These fish are barely on life support."
The sockeye that return are captured and carefully cross-bred with sockeye raised their entire lives in hatcheries and with resident sockeye that remain in Redfish Lake. This cross-breeding is designed to preserve the genetic diversity of the fish so they remain hardy and healthy. Idaho's sockeye travel farther and climb higher — 6,500 feet — than any other sockeye in the world.
"It's a miracle that even one can make the 900-mile journey through eight dams and reservoirs back to Redfish," Peacher said.
Kline acknowledges the sockeye program is not a recovery program, but a last-ditch effort to prevent their extinction. It has become one of the most popular salmon programs among Idaho leaders, including Gov. Jim Risch who urged the Northwest Power and Conservation Council in June to continue its support for the program despite scientists' criticism.
Peacher doesn't want the program to end, but she wants more done to help sockeye, including removing Lower Granite and three other dams on the Snake River in Washington.
"If we really want to bring sockeye back, it's time for the federal government to admit that the status quo isn't working," she said.
SIDEBAR FOLLOWS
Additional Information
Sockeye and Sunbeam Dam
The fate of Idaho's sockeye has long been linked to dams. Sunbeam Dam was built across the Salmon River in 1910 to provide electricity to mines in the Yankee Fork area, cutting sockeye off from Redfish Lake and other spawning lakes in the Sawtooth Basin. Few if any sockeye returned to the lake for 20 years until 1931, when local sportsmen blew up the dam. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game finished the job in 1934.
Miraculously, 200 sockeye were seen spawning in Redfish by biologists in 1942. By 1955, spawner numbers had grown to 4,361. As more dams were built on the Snake and Columbia rivers, sockeye numbers declined until Lower Granite was finished in 1975, after which sockeye plunged to only double- and single-digit returns until 1995, when no sockeye returned to Redfish Lake.
Sockeye head toward Sawtooths
Fish and Game biologist hopes up to 8 of 15 will make it through final leg of journey to Redfish Lake
A lonely sockeye salmon loitered Sunday in a pool on the Salmon River below the Sawtooth Hatchery, waiting to make its final trip home.
The endangered red fish is one of only 15 that passed through Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River in Washington, the last of eight dams between Idaho and the Pacific. If history is a good guide, up to eight of those fish may complete the final 452-mile trip past Lewiston, up the Salmon River, through Idaho's wilderness and into the Sawtooth Valley.
"They're starting to come back," said Paul Kline, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game biologist in charge of the sockeye captive breeding program.
The sockeye return either to a weir on Redfish Lake Creek or to a trap at the Sawtooth Hatchery, depending on where they are released and whether they came from naturally spawning fish in Redfish Lake. Some sockeye also return to Pettit and Alturas lakes, located above the hatchery, and are captured in the trap.
The sockeye, like all salmon runs this year, are arriving slightly later than usual, Kline said. But he is hopeful half of the 15 fish seen at Lower Granite will survive the last leg of the journey.
"We're still averaging 54 to 55 percent conversion since this program started," Kline said.
Sockeye were listed as an endangered species in 1991 as the population was heading toward extinction. The fish caught the region's imagination in 1992, when Lonesome Larry was the only sockeye to return to Redfish Lake.
He and just over a dozen other native sockeye that returned in the early 1990s provided the sperm and eggs for sockeye raised in several hatcheries and released back into the wild since as part of the captive breeding program. Earlier this year, an 11-member Independent Science Review Panel said downstream threats such as dams, predators and fishing, coupled with reduced genetic resiliency in the small sockeye population, make the $2.5 million annual program ineffective.
Last year, 23 sockeye made the trip to Lower Granite, but only six returned to the Sawtooth Valley.
"It's so sad to me to really think they might not come back," said Amanda Peacher, outreach director for Idaho Rivers United in Boise. "These fish are barely on life support."
The sockeye that return are captured and carefully cross-bred with sockeye raised their entire lives in hatcheries and with resident sockeye that remain in Redfish Lake. This cross-breeding is designed to preserve the genetic diversity of the fish so they remain hardy and healthy. Idaho's sockeye travel farther and climb higher — 6,500 feet — than any other sockeye in the world.
"It's a miracle that even one can make the 900-mile journey through eight dams and reservoirs back to Redfish," Peacher said.
Kline acknowledges the sockeye program is not a recovery program, but a last-ditch effort to prevent their extinction. It has become one of the most popular salmon programs among Idaho leaders, including Gov. Jim Risch who urged the Northwest Power and Conservation Council in June to continue its support for the program despite scientists' criticism.
Peacher doesn't want the program to end, but she wants more done to help sockeye, including removing Lower Granite and three other dams on the Snake River in Washington.
"If we really want to bring sockeye back, it's time for the federal government to admit that the status quo isn't working," she said.
SIDEBAR FOLLOWS
Additional Information
Sockeye and Sunbeam Dam
The fate of Idaho's sockeye has long been linked to dams. Sunbeam Dam was built across the Salmon River in 1910 to provide electricity to mines in the Yankee Fork area, cutting sockeye off from Redfish Lake and other spawning lakes in the Sawtooth Basin. Few if any sockeye returned to the lake for 20 years until 1931, when local sportsmen blew up the dam. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game finished the job in 1934.
Miraculously, 200 sockeye were seen spawning in Redfish by biologists in 1942. By 1955, spawner numbers had grown to 4,361. As more dams were built on the Snake and Columbia rivers, sockeye numbers declined until Lower Granite was finished in 1975, after which sockeye plunged to only double- and single-digit returns until 1995, when no sockeye returned to Redfish Lake.
Thursday, August 10, 2006
Sunbeam Dam

The following is an excerpt from a New York Times article dated September 26, 1999, in an article titled From Boise To the Back of Beyond, By L.J. DAVIS
"On the river, a few miles north of Stanley, is half a dam. It is a crude concrete affair, originally designed to supply electrical power to the Sunbeam mine. The historical marker explains that it was dynamited by the authorities because the mine was bankrupt and the fish ladder no longer worked. This is a fib.
" 'In 1934,' former Gov. Cecil Andrus writes in his memoirs, 'a party or parties unknown ran a dynamite-laden raft into Sunbeam Dam.' The dam blocked the annual salmon run. The party or parties unknown were never caught, a fairly unusual circumstance in this thinly populated country. But history was against them. Once, 16 million salmon migrated annually to the Columbia River system. Hundreds of thousands reached the sprawling grounds at the headwaters of the Salmon and the Snake, but now the fish have to navigate through seven Federal dams and one diversion. Only a handful make it."
Here is another account. . .
"In 1910, miners built Sunbeam Dam on the Salmon River east of Stanley, cutting off the sockeye's migration route. They were thought to have gone extinct in the 1920s. But the fish reappeared in 1931 after sportsmen blew a hole in Sunbeam Dam."
And another.
"Dams' detrimental effects on fish have been obvious for decades. In fact, Idaho dynamited the 10-m-tall Sunbeam Dam in Custer County in the early 1930s strictly to improve the annual sockeye salmon run up the Salmon River."
The following is taken from the sign at the dam site. A somewhat conflicting account.
Sunbeam Dam
"The Sunbeam Dam was constructed by the Sunbeam Consolidated Gold Mines Company to provide power for their mill located 13 miles up Yankee Fork on Jordan Creek.
"Construction of the dam and power plant began in June, 1909, and was completed in May, 1910.
"The mill and mine operated almost a year on the electrcity from this dam but the low cost of electric power couldn't compensate for the low value of the mine's ore. The Sunbeam property was sold at a sheriff's auction in April, 1911. Caretakers remained but the power plant was never used again.
"The dam's fish ladders eventually fell into disrepair. Idaho Fish and Game then contracted the blasting of the bank next to the dam to allow fish passage in 1934.
Closing thoughts:
Present day, four lower snake river dams are attributed to preventing the recovery of salmon in the Salmon River basin.
From the Idaho Rivers United website:
"Idaho Rivers United is spearheading the fight to save Idaho's wild salmon and steelhead from extinction. Four huge dams on the lower Snake River in southeast Washington need to be partially removed for these amazing fish to make a comeback. Dam removal will greatly improve survival of the fish as they migrate over 1,000 miles to and from the Pacific Ocean.
"Idaho Rivers United is dedicated to helping concerned citizens be effective advocates for Idaho's salmon and steelhead.
A lake named for its historical encounter with these fish, Redfish Lake, averages single digit returns each year of this legendary species.
If you would like to see the river return to and thrive with the fish of its namesake, perhaps allowing Redfish Lake to live up to its name (rather then renaming it "Deadfish Lake"?), support leaders whom take action or groups who fight the fight.
Environmental action makes sense; economic, financial, social, moral . . .
Wednesday, August 02, 2006
Evening adventures
Tonight after work, I came home to face a nagging camera. It said to me "Where have you been? You work too much. We never spend time together anymore! Are you cheating on me with another electronic device? I am afraid our relationship is becoming too distant. What happened to us?"
So as we all know we must keep the other half happy. So I loaded up the gear and off I went. I have been thinking I should get up into the park and do a little photography after work one of these days. I have been working until 7pm most nights so it makes it a little difficult. Long days make me tired and all I want to do is go home and crash. And last night I helped a coworker move into his new place.
Today we have had rain storms moving through so I thought the clouds may put on a show. So off I went. My results are marginal. Nothing stellar but it was a fun night none the less . . . and plus, I renewed my bond with my camera and made her happy. (Are cameras a 'her'? Cars are a 'her' but I have never heard of a camera being referred to anything other then "my baby.")

String Lake Outlet, Grand Teton National Park, Aug 2006
Lens (mm): 12, ISO: 100, Aperture: 22, Shutter: 1/2

Jenny Lake & Moon, Grand Teton National Park, Aug 2006
Lens (mm): 12, ISO: 100, Aperture: 16, Shutter: 30 sec

Teton Glacier Turnout, Grand Teton National Park, Aug 2006
Lens (mm): 12, ISO: 100, Aperture: 8.0, Shutter: 253 sec
So as we all know we must keep the other half happy. So I loaded up the gear and off I went. I have been thinking I should get up into the park and do a little photography after work one of these days. I have been working until 7pm most nights so it makes it a little difficult. Long days make me tired and all I want to do is go home and crash. And last night I helped a coworker move into his new place.
Today we have had rain storms moving through so I thought the clouds may put on a show. So off I went. My results are marginal. Nothing stellar but it was a fun night none the less . . . and plus, I renewed my bond with my camera and made her happy. (Are cameras a 'her'? Cars are a 'her' but I have never heard of a camera being referred to anything other then "my baby.")

String Lake Outlet, Grand Teton National Park, Aug 2006
Lens (mm): 12, ISO: 100, Aperture: 22, Shutter: 1/2

Jenny Lake & Moon, Grand Teton National Park, Aug 2006
Lens (mm): 12, ISO: 100, Aperture: 16, Shutter: 30 sec

Teton Glacier Turnout, Grand Teton National Park, Aug 2006
Lens (mm): 12, ISO: 100, Aperture: 8.0, Shutter: 253 sec






