Monday, August 28, 2006

Granite Falls x2

I hesitate to post this image as well. I don't want to weaken the first shot I did by showing this image. Oh well, its just a blog post.

What do you think? Which is better? This post or the previous post?

9 Comments:

Blogger Michael Slade said...

Jon,

I think the second is better. Less distortion, more flow for me within the image. Also it shows the waterfall in more context. The first just shows the water movement.

IMO the first weakens the second. :)

11:30 PM, August 28, 2006  
Anonymous Veronica Black said...

The first one is my favorite.

6:21 AM, August 29, 2006  
Blogger pinholeman said...

i like this one better. if you hadn't put a watermark on it, i'd steal it!

6:41 AM, August 29, 2006  
Anonymous James said...

I prefer the composition of this one.

7:56 AM, August 29, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks guys.

No stealing Mark. You already stole my job from me. ; )

12:32 PM, August 29, 2006  
Blogger Sally Anderson said...

I guess I will go against the grain and say that I like the first post better. Both are good but I enjoy the first more.

8:35 PM, August 29, 2006  
Blogger Tyler said...

I'm with Sally and Veronica. I like the first just a bit better. I like that it not the typical view of a waterfall.

...take it for what it's worth...

9:45 PM, August 29, 2006  
Blogger darren said...

I didn't know you had so many fans. I like the latest photograph for the reasons slade gives.

10:36 PM, August 29, 2006  
Blogger Jon said...

Its all this fame that requires me to have a personal assistant. (see previous post).

By the way, I am totally confused on which image people are refering to. I think some are calling this post the 'first' image and the other post the second.

I refer to the tighter image as the first and the pano as the second. Is that what everybody is refering to?

Darren, if you post to your blog, you get comments. Now get to it.

Plan on being in Jackson next wednesday for Slade's presentation at the monthy photo seminar.

10:39 PM, August 29, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home