I think the second is better. Less distortion, more flow for me within the image. Also it shows the waterfall in more context. The first just shows the water movement.
Its all this fame that requires me to have a personal assistant. (see previous post).
By the way, I am totally confused on which image people are refering to. I think some are calling this post the 'first' image and the other post the second.
I refer to the tighter image as the first and the pano as the second. Is that what everybody is refering to?
Darren, if you post to your blog, you get comments. Now get to it.
Plan on being in Jackson next wednesday for Slade's presentation at the monthy photo seminar.
9 Comments:
Jon,
I think the second is better. Less distortion, more flow for me within the image. Also it shows the waterfall in more context. The first just shows the water movement.
IMO the first weakens the second. :)
The first one is my favorite.
i like this one better. if you hadn't put a watermark on it, i'd steal it!
I prefer the composition of this one.
Thanks guys.
No stealing Mark. You already stole my job from me. ; )
I guess I will go against the grain and say that I like the first post better. Both are good but I enjoy the first more.
I'm with Sally and Veronica. I like the first just a bit better. I like that it not the typical view of a waterfall.
...take it for what it's worth...
I didn't know you had so many fans. I like the latest photograph for the reasons slade gives.
Its all this fame that requires me to have a personal assistant. (see previous post).
By the way, I am totally confused on which image people are refering to. I think some are calling this post the 'first' image and the other post the second.
I refer to the tighter image as the first and the pano as the second. Is that what everybody is refering to?
Darren, if you post to your blog, you get comments. Now get to it.
Plan on being in Jackson next wednesday for Slade's presentation at the monthy photo seminar.
Post a Comment
<< Home